I Thought You Didn't Care. You Thought You Were Trying.

19 Oct

When different minds misunderstand each other in relationships, even love can start to feel like rejection.

There's a particular kind of loneliness that comes from feeling misunderstood by someone who genuinely loves you.

You know they care. At least, you think they do. You've shared a life, made plans, supported each other through difficult moments. And yet, sometimes their behaviour makes absolutely no sense to you.

You tell them something important, and they barely respond. You explain why something hurts, and they offer a practical solution when all you wanted was a little comfort. You ask them to remember something that matters to you, and somehow, despite promising they would, they forget. Again.

Eventually, you begin to wonder whether the problem is simply that you care more than they do.

Meanwhile, the person on the other side of the relationship may be having an entirely different experience. They remember how much effort they put into getting things right. They know how carefully they considered their words. They remember wanting to help, wanting to make you happy, wanting to avoid another argument.

And somehow, none of that seems to count.

Two people can end up feeling terribly alone in the same relationship, each convinced the other doesn't understand them. Sometimes there are deeper relationship difficulties behind that disconnection. Sometimes one person really isn't making the effort the relationship needs.

But there's another possibility we don't explore nearly enough.

What if some of the behaviours we've been interpreting as emotional messages were never intended as messages at all?

When behaviour tells a story that isn't quite true

Human beings are remarkably good at creating explanations for other people's behaviour. We do it constantly, often without realising.

Your partner doesn't ask how an important meeting went. You feel unimportant.

They withdraw during an argument. You feel abandoned.

They don't notice that you're upset. You wonder how someone who knows you so well can be so oblivious.

The feelings these situations create are real. They deserve attention, particularly when the same experiences keep happening. But the explanations we attach to them aren't always accurate.

We tend to interpret other people's behaviour using our own understanding of what that behaviour means. If we naturally remember important dates, forgetting one might seem like evidence of indifference. If we express care through conversation and questions, someone who rarely asks them might appear uninterested.

We assume that the things which come naturally to us should be reasonably straightforward for everyone else, especially someone who knows us intimately.

And that's where things can get complicated.

Because the way someone experiences attention, memory, emotion, language or sensory information can be very different from our own.

Those differences don't necessarily become obvious when we first meet someone. They may not even be apparent during the early stages of a relationship, when life is exciting and we're giving each other enormous amounts of attention.

But over time, when responsibilities accumulate, routines settle in and life becomes demanding, they can begin to shape everyday interactions in ways neither person fully understands.

Different minds, different experiences

Think about something as ordinary as remembering to do a task.

For some adults with ADHD, the difficulty isn't necessarily remembering that something matters. It can be holding an intention in mind, organising the steps needed to complete it and following through at the appropriate moment. Someone might genuinely intend to book that appointment, reply to that message or organise something special. They may think about it repeatedly throughout the day and still fail to do it.

To their partner, the result is another broken promise. To them, it may feel like another inexplicable failure to accomplish something they desperately wanted to get right. Neither experience cancels out the other.

Now think about an emotionally difficult conversation.

One person needs to talk immediately. Speaking helps them organise their thoughts, understand their feelings and feel connected to their partner. The other needs silence.

Perhaps they're trying to process what they've heard. Perhaps they're struggling to identify exactly what they're feeling. Perhaps the intensity of the conversation, the noise around them or the pressure to respond immediately has become overwhelming.

The first person interprets the silence as withdrawal or indifference. The second experiences the insistence on talking as unbearable pressure. The more one pushes for connection, the more the other retreats.

Before long, they're arguing about the silence rather than the original problem.

There can also be differences in how people understand language.

Some people rely heavily on facial expressions, tone of voice and the meanings implied between words. Others prefer direct communication and may find indirect messages much harder to interpret.

Imagine telling your partner, "It's fine," while hoping they'll recognise from your expression that you're upset.

If they accept your words literally, you might feel hurt that they didn't notice. They might be genuinely confused when you later explain that everything wasn't fine at all.

These examples aren't exclusive to neurodivergent people, and they certainly don't describe everyone with ADHD or autism.

But neurocognitive differences can make some of these experiences more pronounced or persistent. They can also interact with personality, emotional history, stress and the expectations we've developed about relationships.

And because we rarely see the mental effort behind another person's behaviour, it's remarkably easy to mistake difficulty for unwillingness.

When wanting connection and needing distance happen together

Something that caught my attention while reading public discussions about AuDHD was how often people described experiences that appeared contradictory from the outside.

One person described being reserved and distant at one moment, then friendly and outgoing later that same evening. Another spoke about craving social interaction while finding gatherings overwhelming.

I kept thinking about how easily those experiences could be misunderstood in a relationship.

Imagine going to a gathering with your partner.

You're laughing, talking, enjoying yourself. Perhaps you've been looking forward to seeing everyone for days.

Then, quite suddenly, you become quiet. You stop participating in the conversation, retreat to a quieter corner or ask whether you can go home.

Your partner looks confused. They've watched you laughing and chatting all evening. You seemed perfectly happy half an hour ago. Now you're barely speaking.

Have they done something wrong? Did someone upset you? Are you annoyed with them? Perhaps they even feel embarrassed because they're left explaining why you've suddenly withdrawn.

But perhaps you really were enjoying yourself.

Perhaps you wanted that connection, loved being there and also reached a point where the noise, conversations and stimulation became too much.

Your enjoyment was genuine. So is your need to leave.

For people who experience significant sensory or social overload, those two things can coexist. And for some people with both ADHD and autism, the pull towards stimulation and novelty can sit alongside a very real need for predictability, recovery and quiet.

That combination can be confusing even to the person experiencing it.

Now imagine trying to explain it to someone who has never felt anything similar. You might say you're exhausted, only to be reminded that you were the one who wanted to go out. You might ask for time alone, only to hear that you're being antisocial.

Or perhaps you start pushing yourself to stay longer than you're comfortable with because you don't want your partner to feel rejected.

Over time, both people may develop expectations around these situations. One begins anticipating another disappointing evening. The other begins dreading the moment they'll need to ask for a break.

What started as a difference in sensory or social capacity becomes an emotional issue between them.

Of course, withdrawing from a social situation can mean many different things. It might be overwhelm, anxiety, frustration, tiredness or something happening within the relationship itself.

That's precisely why asking what happened is so much more useful than deciding we already know.

Does empathy always look the way we expect?

I find this one of the most interesting questions in conversations about neurodiversity and relationships.

We often talk about empathy as though it's something we can easily recognise. Someone notices we're upset, asks what's wrong, offers comfort and responds in a way that makes us feel understood.

But empathy is more complicated than that.

Recognising another person's emotional state, feeling concern for them and knowing how to communicate that concern are related abilities, but they aren't identical.

Someone might recognise that their partner is distressed and immediately start looking for ways to solve the problem. Their partner, meanwhile, may experience those suggestions as a refusal to acknowledge how they're feeling.

Another person might feel deeply affected by someone else's sadness but struggle to find words that communicate their concern.

And someone who needs time to identify or process their own emotions may find it especially difficult to respond during an intense conversation. None of those responses, on their own, tells us how much the person cares.

Autism research has introduced an interesting concept known as the double empathy problem. It suggests that communication difficulties between autistic and non-autistic people may sometimes arise because both find it difficult to understand the other's way of experiencing and communicating, rather than the difficulty belonging exclusively to the autistic person.

Some studies have found differences in how easily people establish rapport across neurocognitive profiles. However, this research is still developing, and differences in rapport don't necessarily tell us everything about empathy, particularly within long-term relationships.

What the concept offers is a valuable invitation to question our assumptions.

When two people misunderstand each other, why are we sometimes so quick to decide which one is communicating incorrectly?

Perhaps we should spend a little more time exploring what each person thought was happening.

When our past experiences enter the room

There's another layer to these misunderstandings that I think deserves more attention.

In a public discussion about neurodivergence, someone raised the importance of trauma and attachment, particularly when difficult experiences have involved people we love or trust. It's an observation worth taking seriously.

We don't arrive in relationships with completely fresh expectations. We bring our previous experiences, our fears, what we've learned about being loved and the ways we've found to protect ourselves when something hurts.

Someone who has repeatedly experienced criticism may become particularly sensitive to signs of disappointment.

Someone who has learned that silence means punishment might find it extremely difficult when their partner stops talking during an argument.

And someone who has spent years feeling misunderstood may become defensive before their partner has even finished explaining what is wrong.

Now consider what happens when those experiences meet neurocognitive differences. Imagine one person who becomes overwhelmed during conflict and needs time alone to process their emotions. Their partner has a history of relationships in which withdrawing, refusing to speak or disappearing emotionally were used as punishment.

When the first person asks for space, they may genuinely be trying to prevent the argument from escalating. But their partner experiences that request through a completely different emotional history. To them, the silence feels frightening. They may become anxious, ask more questions or insist on resolving the argument immediately.

The increased pressure overwhelms the first person even further, making them withdraw more. And now both people are reacting to something the other doesn't fully understand.

One is trying to manage overwhelm. The other is trying to feel safe. Neither necessarily intends to hurt the other, but the distress can become very real.

This is one reason I think we need to be careful about interpreting every relationship difficulty exclusively through neurodivergence.

A person's neurocognitive profile may influence how they communicate, regulate emotions or respond to stimulation. Their personal history may influence what those experiences mean to them.

Then there are the patterns the couple has developed together, sometimes over many years. Trying to understand the relationship without considering those different layers can leave us with an incomplete picture. And an incomplete picture can lead to solutions that never quite address the problem.

Understanding someone doesn't mean accepting everything

This is where the conversation needs to become more thoughtful, because there's a danger in explaining every painful interaction through neurodivergence.

Imagine that your partner has repeatedly forgotten commitments that matter to you.

Learning about executive functioning might help you understand why those difficulties occur. It might explain why reminders don't always work, why intentions don't reliably translate into action or why criticism leads to such intense frustration.

That understanding could change the way you approach the problem.

But it doesn't mean your disappointment suddenly becomes unreasonable.

If you're constantly managing responsibilities alone, if promises are repeatedly broken or if you're exhausted from having to anticipate everything, those experiences matter too.

And the reverse is equally important.

A neurodivergent person shouldn't have to spend their life suppressing their needs, concealing their difficulties or forcing themselves to communicate in ways that cause significant distress simply to be considered a good partner.

A relationship needs enough room for both people's experiences to be real.

That means recognising the difference between understanding a difficulty and finding ways to address its consequences.

Someone may genuinely struggle with remembering plans. They may also need to participate in creating a system that makes those commitments more reliable.

Someone may need space during disagreements. Their partner may also need to know that the conversation will be revisited rather than quietly abandoned.

Someone may find emotional conversations exhausting. That doesn't make emotional connection an unreasonable need.

These things can coexist.

It's also worth remembering that neurodivergence doesn't explain every difficulty in a relationship. Differences in attachment, emotional history, learned behaviour, stress and individual values may all be relevant.

Sometimes people are genuinely incompatible in important ways. Sometimes someone is unwilling to acknowledge the effect of their behaviour. And harmful or controlling behaviour should never be dismissed as a simple communication difference.

Curiosity is important, but so are boundaries, responsibility and emotional safety.

Sometimes the argument isn't really about the argument

Consider a couple who have been fighting for years about forgotten plans.

One partner says, "I shouldn't have to remind you about everything."

The other replies, "You have no idea how hard I'm trying."

They've probably had some version of this conversation dozens of times. What interests me is what might be happening beneath those words.

For the first partner, forgetting has become associated with feeling unimportant. Every missed commitment brings back the same painful thought: If I really mattered, you'd remember.

For the second, repeated criticism may have become associated with shame and failure. They might hear every complaint as confirmation that, regardless of how hard they try, they're never going to be good enough.

Now both people are responding to far more than the forgotten plan.

One is asking to matter. The other is desperate for their effort to be recognised.

And the harder they try to defend their own experience, the less able they become to hear the other's.

Of course, knowing this doesn't magically organise the calendar or repair years of disappointment. The practical problem still needs attention. But it changes what we might need to explore.

We can begin to look at how responsibilities are shared, what support is needed and whether expectations are realistic. We can also explore the meanings each person has developed around these repeated experiences.

Perhaps they need a different planning system. Perhaps they need to rebuild trust through consistent follow-through. Perhaps one partner needs help with executive functioning while the other needs space to talk about the resentment they've accumulated.

Very often, meaningful change involves both practical adjustments and emotional work.

A shared calendar might not be particularly romantic, but neither is spending every Sunday arguing about who forgot what.

What happens when we stop assuming we know?

Imagine returning to that difficult conversation where one partner wants to talk and the other becomes silent.

Instead of concluding that the silence means indifference, the first person might say:

"When you stop talking, I start feeling as though you don't care about what I'm saying. Can you help me understand what's happening?"

And perhaps the answer is:

"I'm listening, but I'm struggling to process everything. I don't want to say something hurtful. I need a little time."

That doesn't erase the first person's hurt, but it gives them information they didn't have before.

Perhaps they can agree that difficult conversations can be paused, provided they both know when they'll return to them.

Perhaps writing down complicated thoughts is easier than trying to explain them aloud under pressure.

Perhaps one person needs to learn to express their needs more directly, while the other needs to practise checking in rather than assuming everything is fine.

These adjustments won't work for every couple, and sometimes there are much deeper issues to address.

But they illustrate something important.

When we understand what's happening beneath a behaviour, we have more possibilities than simply asking someone to try harder.

We can begin to work with the difficulties rather than continually colliding with them.

And that can make an enormous difference.

Looking beyond the behaviour

One of the questions I find most valuable when thinking about relationships is deceptively simple:

What does this experience mean to each person?

I want to understand what happened, of course. But I'm also interested in what each person believed was happening, what they felt, what they needed and how they responded.

Those details can tell us much more about a recurring difficulty than the argument itself. When neurodivergence is part of the picture, there are additional questions worth exploring.

Is someone struggling to communicate their feelings, or do they need more time to understand them?

Is a partner refusing to participate, or are the demands of the situation overwhelming their ability to respond?

Is something being experienced as rejection because of what it means to one person, even though it wasn't intended that way by the other?

How might someone's previous experiences be influencing the way they interpret the situation?

And importantly, what needs to change so that understanding becomes something useful rather than another conversation that leads nowhere?

This is where individual psychotherapy, couples therapy and an understanding of neurodivergence can complement one another.

Individual work can help someone recognise their emotional patterns, understand their needs and explore the experiences that influence how they interpret relationships.

Couples therapy can create space to examine what happens between two people, especially when repeated misunderstandings have left them defensive, frustrated or disconnected.

A neurodiversity-informed approach can add another layer of understanding, helping us recognise when conventional expectations about communication, emotional expression or everyday functioning may not fit the people involved.

At Shoreline, I believe it's important to make room for all of those perspectives.

People are rarely as simple as the labels we give them, and relationships deserve more than explanations that assign one person all the responsibility while overlooking the other's experience.

Sometimes the most useful work begins when we stop trying to establish who is wrong long enough to understand what is actually happening.

Maybe there's something you haven't understood yet

If you've spent years feeling that your partner doesn't care, I wouldn't ask you to abandon that feeling simply because there might be a different explanation.

Your hurt deserves to be taken seriously.

But I would be curious about how you arrived at that conclusion, what experiences have reinforced it and whether there are things about your partner's internal world that neither of you has fully understood.

Equally, if you're the person who feels constantly misunderstood, whose efforts never seem to count or whose way of communicating repeatedly disappoints someone you love, I'd want to understand that experience too.

You may have spent a long time believing that you're simply bad at relationships.

Perhaps you've been told you're insensitive, careless, distant or difficult. Perhaps you've tried so hard to become the person your partner seems to need that you've lost sight of your own needs along the way.

Those experiences deserve attention.

Sometimes a new understanding of neurodivergence helps people make sense of difficulties that have followed them for years. Sometimes it reveals patterns that need practical support, therapeutic work or a different approach to communication.

And sometimes it helps people recognise that, despite their genuine affection for one another, something important in the relationship needs to change.

We can't know which of those possibilities applies without looking more closely.

But imagine what might happen if, instead of spending another evening arguing about what a particular behaviour supposedly proves, two people became curious enough to ask what it actually means.

They might discover that they've been misunderstanding each other for a very long time.

They might discover that they need more support than they realised.

Or they might finally be able to explain something they've never quite found the words for.

Being understood doesn't solve every problem in a relationship. But it can change which problems we're trying to solve.

And sometimes, that is where the conversation we've needed for years finally begins.

Individual Therapy

Couples & Relationship Therapy

Neurodivergence and Relationships

Neurodivergence